Obviously, the current budget proposal is an enormous change to the mission of public education in Wareham, particularly for elementary and special education students. Given that the news was just now shared outside of the administrative team, it is too early to issue any significant reaction.
The WEA will be collecting information throughout the system from multiple sources as part of looking at this plan, as well as the new initiatives pursued by the district at this time of fiscal distress. Please contact me with any thoughts, information, or concerns you think can help ensure that any budget changes have as small an impact on the delivery of quality education by quality educators as possible.
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Website updates and more
Sorry for the absence of news on this blog; I have been posting most new stuff on our WEA Facebook page with the help of Communications.
The website has been updated with all relevant documents from the November and December board meetings. Also, the board did vote unanimously in November to reject a proposed MoA on the Massachusetts Math + Science Insight grant. The high school applied for this grant without performing the task of working with the Association. Several members testified to the negative academic effects this program is having, distorting the educational progress at the behest of the grant's funders. Since the vote, one member has come forward with a different opinion but at present the vote stands.
Unit C negotiations to succeed the contract that expired in August are still open. Ground rules prevent discussion of the state of those negotiations in a publicly accessible mode such as this.
I am growing concern about the number and range of initiatives that seem to be implemented before the planning is complete. The "Eighth Grade Academy" discussed in the recent School Committee meeting has potential as an idea, but it is curious to see a vote on something that remains so ill-defined.
Evaluations have had no notable change in form recently, and the evaluations committee has not met for several weeks. As always, please contact me or another officer with concerns.
The website has been updated with all relevant documents from the November and December board meetings. Also, the board did vote unanimously in November to reject a proposed MoA on the Massachusetts Math + Science Insight grant. The high school applied for this grant without performing the task of working with the Association. Several members testified to the negative academic effects this program is having, distorting the educational progress at the behest of the grant's funders. Since the vote, one member has come forward with a different opinion but at present the vote stands.
Unit C negotiations to succeed the contract that expired in August are still open. Ground rules prevent discussion of the state of those negotiations in a publicly accessible mode such as this.
I am growing concern about the number and range of initiatives that seem to be implemented before the planning is complete. The "Eighth Grade Academy" discussed in the recent School Committee meeting has potential as an idea, but it is curious to see a vote on something that remains so ill-defined.
Evaluations have had no notable change in form recently, and the evaluations committee has not met for several weeks. As always, please contact me or another officer with concerns.
Sunday, October 6, 2013
October 17 venue change
A quick note that the October meeting with members slated for Decas has had its venue changed. The new location will be announced shortly.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Oops! Sorry to the scholars of Wareham!
Whoops! In the process of recognizing the staff for their work in raising the bar in our MCAS scores, I unforgivably forgot to recognize the students for all their efforts! Sorry to every last one -- it was your work that made the changes happen!
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
L'Shona Tovah
Greeting to all members and friends of our WEA on the occasion of the New Year of the Jewish calendar. Hopefully it will bring great happiness and satisfaction.
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Welcome back
My colleagues,
It is an honor to serve as the president of such a talented group of educators as we embark on a crucial year for the enterprise of public education in Wareham. A special thank you to all those who attended the opening meeting after school on Wednesday. For those who did not, the presentation has been posted as a PDF in the members-only section of our website. Also, the officers' list has been updated to reflect personnel voted in at the board meeting on Wednesday afternoon.
I'm hoping to spend more time in the buildings this year thanks to a more central location and earlier schedule. The days I am scheduled to be in other buildings is listed on our calendar. I'm hoping for a good year for all, for our students, our community, and this body of dedicated educators. Rest up, and here's to a great year!
It is an honor to serve as the president of such a talented group of educators as we embark on a crucial year for the enterprise of public education in Wareham. A special thank you to all those who attended the opening meeting after school on Wednesday. For those who did not, the presentation has been posted as a PDF in the members-only section of our website. Also, the officers' list has been updated to reflect personnel voted in at the board meeting on Wednesday afternoon.
I'm hoping to spend more time in the buildings this year thanks to a more central location and earlier schedule. The days I am scheduled to be in other buildings is listed on our calendar. I'm hoping for a good year for all, for our students, our community, and this body of dedicated educators. Rest up, and here's to a great year!
Monday, August 12, 2013
Some real talk about Level 3, Part II
Last week I wrote a review of how Wareham was labeled a Level 3 district. To review, one of seven schools in town is slightly on the wrong side of the 20% line based on myriad calculations based on MCAS results. But wait, there’s more!
As mentioned last week, Level 3 schools are in the bottom 20% in the state, a line of division based on the “hey, gotta draw the line somewhere” method successfully used by Europeans to set the national borders of Africa and the Middle East. However, being at 17% doesn’t mean that WMS just needs to “improve by 3.5%” to get to Level 2. It has to improve by a greater degree than the eight schools above it. If state databanks decree that Wareham Middle School improved by 10% last year, and the eight schools above do 12% better, WMS loses ground. This is the philosophy of the New York Stock Exchange – success isn’t what or how well you do, but how you compare to others. The Department of Education buys into it.
Unfortunately, the state stacked the deck against Wareham Middle School last year. A large element of the numerical gymnastics is comparing WMS to schools that the state labels as similar. In the case of WMS, this means nine others that are located in Amesbury, Billerica, Fall River, Medford, Middleborough, New Bedford (two), Plymouth, Rockland, and Taunton. So Wareham is expecting to keep pace with selected schools in these eight towns and cities, and loses points if it doesn't.
Ask if that truly is a representative group. Would you be surprised to learn that of these nine schools, only 3 have a higher percentage of low-income students? There may not be widespread shock that the average per pupil expenditure of these combined districts for the most recent year available is $12,756, compared to $12,241 in Wareham -- that's the red bar on the graph below. Does anyone believe things would improve if each WMS classroom had an additional $10,000 more to spend on education? That's an updated set of books. It's two classroom computers.
►The third item on the list of truths about Level 3: Wareham Middle School was placed on its level largely due to comparisons to schools that aren’t comparable. Now, there may statistical glimmers of hope. Wareham will be placed in a different group this summer, perhaps one that is actually appropriate. The “SGP” scores in recent fifth grade MCAS results, a group whose numbers will be counted as WMS students in reports issued starting in 2014, are a bit higher than those scores in grades 6-8. There is new leadership atop WMS and the public schools. This is a chance at a fresh start. Knowledge may be half the battle, but it doesn't have to all be pessimistic.
Finally, there is a sad, final truth to all this: students are barely part of this discussion. Some test scores in a couple subjects certainly are. A change in level can come by fairly grouping schools, or perhaps moving a new grade to WMS. It may or may not be coincidence that “education” has been stripped down to moving numbers around formulas in spreadsheets, and that “improvement” is the province of accountants and rather than educators. Even when WMS leaves Level 3, as long as this is public education, how much have things really improved?
As mentioned last week, Level 3 schools are in the bottom 20% in the state, a line of division based on the “hey, gotta draw the line somewhere” method successfully used by Europeans to set the national borders of Africa and the Middle East. However, being at 17% doesn’t mean that WMS just needs to “improve by 3.5%” to get to Level 2. It has to improve by a greater degree than the eight schools above it. If state databanks decree that Wareham Middle School improved by 10% last year, and the eight schools above do 12% better, WMS loses ground. This is the philosophy of the New York Stock Exchange – success isn’t what or how well you do, but how you compare to others. The Department of Education buys into it.
Unfortunately, the state stacked the deck against Wareham Middle School last year. A large element of the numerical gymnastics is comparing WMS to schools that the state labels as similar. In the case of WMS, this means nine others that are located in Amesbury, Billerica, Fall River, Medford, Middleborough, New Bedford (two), Plymouth, Rockland, and Taunton. So Wareham is expecting to keep pace with selected schools in these eight towns and cities, and loses points if it doesn't.
Ask if that truly is a representative group. Would you be surprised to learn that of these nine schools, only 3 have a higher percentage of low-income students? There may not be widespread shock that the average per pupil expenditure of these combined districts for the most recent year available is $12,756, compared to $12,241 in Wareham -- that's the red bar on the graph below. Does anyone believe things would improve if each WMS classroom had an additional $10,000 more to spend on education? That's an updated set of books. It's two classroom computers.
►The third item on the list of truths about Level 3: Wareham Middle School was placed on its level largely due to comparisons to schools that aren’t comparable. Now, there may statistical glimmers of hope. Wareham will be placed in a different group this summer, perhaps one that is actually appropriate. The “SGP” scores in recent fifth grade MCAS results, a group whose numbers will be counted as WMS students in reports issued starting in 2014, are a bit higher than those scores in grades 6-8. There is new leadership atop WMS and the public schools. This is a chance at a fresh start. Knowledge may be half the battle, but it doesn't have to all be pessimistic.
Finally, there is a sad, final truth to all this: students are barely part of this discussion. Some test scores in a couple subjects certainly are. A change in level can come by fairly grouping schools, or perhaps moving a new grade to WMS. It may or may not be coincidence that “education” has been stripped down to moving numbers around formulas in spreadsheets, and that “improvement” is the province of accountants and rather than educators. Even when WMS leaves Level 3, as long as this is public education, how much have things really improved?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)